sillypolls:

What is your url based on?

A fandom/media thing that I like

A name or nickname I go by

An inside joke

Something I like from real life (like an object or animal or something)

It’s a descriptor of the kinds of things I post (like art or perhaps polls)

It’s something that describes me

It’s based on a phrase or quote

It’s whatever first popped into my head, no real reason behind it

Other reason for it (tell me in the tags!)

show results

(via mushroomcaphat)

something i like from real life <333

jonnywaistcoat:

If you had teeth and a jaw strong enough to chew and eat metal, what do you think the best would be? Copper’s obviously a basic bitch answer, but I just don’t think aluminium would have the depth of flavour. I mean, I don’t want to be the lead guy, but why mess with a classic?

(via damage-ko)

dimetrodone:

dimetrodone:

dimetrodone:

I’m the world’s worse advocate for wasps. Everytime I see people repeating bees=nice good pollinators wasps=bad stinging meanies, I face a deep internal struggle trying to explain how they are important to the environment without explaining wasp facts that freak them out in ways they never even thought

“Bees might be cuter and make honey, but wasps are VERY important too, some of them are necessary as pollinators themselves! Hey anyways you wanna hear some fucked up things about figs?”

“You hate wasps? Well think of a bug that you hate more then wasps. There’s probably a parasitoid wasp that lays their eggs inside them and their babies to devour them alive from the inside, reducing that insect species’ population!”

“Your least favourite bug is parasitoid wasps now? Well you are gonna be THRILLED and CONFLICTED about the existence of hyperparasitic wasps.”

(via chimeric-entity)

Access denied: wheelchair metro maps versus everyone else’s

advanced-passenger-train:

ashr202:

advanced-passenger-train:

ashr202:

princeofchronicpain:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Source: The Guardian

The article is now 5 years old, so lets figure out if things have gotten any better.

London: 92/272 - added 42 stations

Paris - 9/303 - no change (paris is actively hostile to adding accessibility)

Barcelona - 153/165 - added 24 stations

NYC - 118/472 - added one station (note: not all stations are fully accessible)

Tokyo - couldn’t find concrete numbers, at least in english, just “96” (note: from 2022)

LA and DC still 100% accessible

A couple systems to add:

Chicago - 103/145

San Fransisco - 100%

Hong Kong - 90/93

If your wondering what the main factor is here: newer systems are usually built to be accessibly from the start (both of the fully accessible systems first opened after 1970), the older ones weren’t and its expensive to refit underground stations, this is why the older systems like nyc, london, and paris are so bad (though paris has no excuse for being *that* bad, not even their modern lines are accessible). They’re also often really underfunded (I know the mta is) and have other issues that are more pressing to management (maintenance, new lines, etc)

Stats on BART?

thats what I was using for san Fransisco

oh hehe

(Source: theguardian.com)

singular los angeles win


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk